Chapter 40
"OUR BROTHERS IN THE DENOMINATIONS"
Leroy Garrett
"Brethren in all denominations." All these years most
of us in the Churches of ChristChristian Churches have not
allowed ourselves to talk like that. Even if we might think it,
and most of us probably do, we do not say it. It is our unwritten
creed that our sisters and brothers are all in what we call the
Church of Christ. While we often refer to "the denominations,"
in contrast to "the Lord's church" (meaning us!), we
do not refer to our brethren in the denominations. In this short
piece I want to show that this sectarian mentality is of recent
date, for our founding fathers did not have this narrow view of
brotherhood.
The phrase is in quotation marks because it is taken from Thomas
Campbell's Declaration and Address, which dates back to
1809 and is one of our founding documents. The Address
is in fact written "To all that love our Lord Jesus Christ,
throughout all the Churches." It is clear that he considers
those in all the churches who love the Lord Jesus Christ as his
brothers and sisters. Time and again in the document he refers
to "our brethren" and "our brethren in all the
denominations," and at least once he refers to them as "Our
dear brethren in all the denominations." While he recognizes
that they are divided into parties, he still refers to them as
"our Christian brethren, however unhappily distinguished
by party names."
He refers to these brethren in the denominations as both the
Christian Church and Church of Christ, such as "so that we
might return to the original constitutional unity of the Christian
Church," and "all the churches of Christ which mutually
acknowledge each other as such." He is not calling any one
denomination or even all of them together the Church of Christ,
but rather the Christians in all the denominations. What he sees
as the Church of Christ transcends any sect or denomination.
That is the basis upon which he set forth in the same document
his first great proposition on unity, often quoted by our people
through the years: "The Church of Christ upon earth is essentially,
intentionally, and constitutionally one."
Thomas Campbell did not suppose he had to refer to "the
Church of Christ" with a lower case c, as our folk are wont
to do, supposing that by using "the church of Christ"
they are affirming nondenominational status. In all such references
as those above Campbell consistently uses the capital C for church,
whether Church of Christ or Christian Church, as I notice most
scholars do when they refer to the church universal. It says
something about where we've been (or not been) when we fastidiously
use "the church of Christ" and refer to less than all
Christians, while others use "the Church of Christ"
when referring to the universal church made up of all believers.
Campbell also says in the Declaration and Address, "This,
we are persuaded, is the uniform sentiment of the real Christians
of every denomination," referring to his plea for unity among
all believers. This explains why the StoneCampbell movement
was an effort to "unite the Christians in all the sects."
They were not trying to unite or amalgamate the denominations,
but to unite "the real Christians" in the denominations.
It is impressive that Campbell did all this writing about "the
Church of Christ" while he yet did not have a single congregation
that would eventually wear this name. This means he saw the true
church as made up of all his dear brethren wherever they were
and whatever party name they might be wearing, and this church
has always existed, ever since the Holy Spirit breathed it into
existence.
It not only existed, but it was by its very nature one, even
if scattered among the sects. Christ's body cannot be divided!
And so he wrote in that document, "The Church of Christ
upon earth is essentially, intentionally, and constitutionally
one."
It would be wonderfully liberating if we could all, like Thomas
Campbell, refer to "our dear brothers and sisters in the
denominations," and realize that we are all together the
true Church of Christ upon earth.
(Restoration Review: Vol. 32, No. 3; March 1990)
 
|