Chapter 2
THOMAS CAMPBELL
WRITES HIS DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
Leroy Garrett
He actually called it the Declaration and Address, but
there is reason to believe that he was influenced by that document
that gave birth to our nation in his selection of a title for
the document that gave birth to our Movement. They were both
a declaration of independence-freedom from tyranny and oppression
and freedom to be an individual before God.
A committee led by Thomas Jefferson worked through the hot summer
of 1776 to produce the first, only to have every line it wrote
brutally scrutinized by the Continental Congress. Thomas Campbell
toiled through the hot summer of 1809, stashed away as he was
in a lonely attic, to turn out the second, only to have it tried
and tested by the Christian Association of Washington that had
helped to bring it to birth. Our nation would never have formed
without the first; our Movement would never have emerged without
the second.
They were both a declaration, with all that term means
to courageous souls; they were both for independence, with
all that word means to tired men who long to be free.
"When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary..."
began that declaration penned by Thomas Jefferson in 1776. "From
the series of events which have taken place in the churches for
many years, we are persuaded that it is high time for us not only
to think, but also to act ..." began that declaration written
by Thomas Campbell in 1809.
Both documents talked about rights. Jefferson wrote of "the
right of the people" to redress wrongs against them. Campbell
wrote of how "No man has a right to judge his brother."
Both declarations burned in righteous anger over the injustices
imposed upon an innocent people. Jefferson referred to the "long
train of abuses and usurpations" that reduce a people to
absolute despotism, and he called for their peace and security.
Campbell insisted that he was "tired and sick of the bitter
jarrings and janglings of a party spirit," and he asked that
the churches might have rest from it all.
The first declaration gave our nation its greatest political principle:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness." Jefferson originally began with:
We hold these truths to be sacred and undeniable . . .
The second declaration gave our Movement its greatest spiritual
principle: "The Church of Christ upon earth is essentially,
intentionally, and constitutionally one: consisting of all those
in every place that profess their faith in Christ and obedience
to him in all things according to the Scriptures, and that manifest
the same by their tempers and conduct, and of none else; as none
else can be truly and properly called Christians."
Jefferson concluded the first declaration by "appealing to
the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions."
Campbell concluded the second declaration by noting that the
unity movement he was launching would "rely upon the all-sufficiency
of the Church's Head; and, through his grace, looking with an
eye of confidence to the generous liberality of the sincere friends
of Christianity."
Both documents say in essence: We do hereby declare that we
are a free people!
The events leading up to the composition of the Declaration
and Address show Thomas Campbell to be a man of great integrity,
sound scholarship, and intense piety. Born in 1763 in Ireland
of Roman Catholic parents who turned Anglican, he became a Presbyterian
and after a few years of teaching school decided to enter the
ministry. He spent three years studying classics at Glasgow,
and then took the seminary course of his own church in nearby
Whitburn. This means that while Irish by birth he was Scottish
by education, and there is evidence that he was strongly influenced
by the "common sense" school of philosophy, led by Thomas
Reid of Glasgow, which was then dominant and which supported Scottish
theologians in their struggle with David Hume, the old Scot who
was known as the great infidel.
He was always a teacher as well as a pastor, conducting private
schools of his own both in Ireland and America. He was teaching
at a sleepy little village named Ballymena, in what is now North
Ireland, when he met and married Jane Corneigle, in whose veins
flowed French Huguenot blood, and it was here that his eldest
son, Alexander, was born in 1788. He later taught at Market Hill
in Armagh county, at which time he became the pastor at Ahorey,
a few miles distant. In company with the present pastor at Ahorey,
Dr. Scott, I was recently privileged to visit both Market Hill
and Ahorey. The little town of Market Hill is now barricaded,
due to the civil war, but it is not too different from what it
was in Campbell's day. The house where he conducted his school
still stands, freshly painted and well preserved, now housing
a quiet little business.
He was pastor at Ahorey from 1798 until 1807, at which time he
embarked for this country. The church has always been Presbyterian
(now the United Presbyterian Church of Ireland), and it has continued
without interruption all these years. Dr. Scott has been pastor
for 18 years and he has great interest in its Campbell heritage.
The environment is still rural, with its rolling hills and white
farm houses stretching in all directions, not unlike the terrain
in western Pennsylvania and Bethany to which the Campbells eventually
came.
The church has a Campbell Tower, built in recent years by Disciples
of this country. (Perry Gresham of Bethany, who led the subscription
drive, wanted me to check to make sure it was there!) The foyer,
below the tower, has a brass relief of Thomas' likeness gracing
a wall, noting the years of his pastorate and acknowledging his
role as founder of the Christian Church in America. The old pews,
each having its own little door, will seat about 125. Here the
Campbells themselves once sat, and it was here that Alexander,
then in his impressionable teens, heard his father's scholarly
and devotional presentations. A stained glass window now honors
the son. The present pulpit area and additional space have since
been built, but the main part of the small church is much like
it was then. The cemetery around it has graves that antedate
the Campbells.
Even in Ireland, where there was both political and religious
unrest, Thomas worked for church union. He was sent by his own
Anti-Burgher Presbyterian Church to Glasgow for unity consultation
with the Burgher Presbyterian Church (the difference was political
rather than doctrinal). The Haldane reformation, which so much
influenced Alexander in Glasgow, also reached into Ireland and
touched Thomas' life. The church still stands in Market Hall
where the reformers often spoke, particularly Rowland Hill, whom
Thomas heard and met. Before he left the Old World he was acquainted
with the views of Glas, Sandeman, and James Haldane.
A Turning Point
It is noteworthy that both Thomas and Alexander found turning
points in reference to the Lord's Supper. We saw in our last
how Alexander walked out of a communion service in Glasgow in
protest of its sectarian character, leaving the Presbyterians
forever. His father, about the same time, had a similar experience
in reference to the Supper, which led to his separation from the
same sect.
Once in this country, he was received into the Associate Synod
of North America, which represented all Seceder Presbyterians,
the "Burgher" dispute not having been imported. He
was assigned to the Presbytery of Chartiers in western Pennsylvania,
which appointed him to an itinerant ministry among Irish immigrants
in what was then frontier country. He was among many of his own
people, some having immigrated from his own part of Ireland.
His views, already expanding back in Europe, became even more
open in the New World. He was not prepared for the narrow sectarian
restrictions that his presbytery placed upon him: to minister
to and serve communion to Seceder Presbyterians only. He was
soon under their judgement for behaving otherwise.
The minutes of the presbytery, which tell the story of his trial,
reveal that there was eventually more involved than his liberal
practices as a preacher on horseback. It was not simply that
he had ecumenical tendencies, but that he had serious misgiving
about the theology of his church. Seven charges were brought
against him, and these were debated in various hearings for two
years, but about mid-way through the dispute Mr. Campbell withdrew
from the presbytery and left the Presbyterian ministry, becoming
an independent. The charges had to do with his opposition to
creeds as terms of communion, his sympathy for the lay ministry,
his desire to fellowship other churches, his idea that men can
preach without being called, and his belief that a believer can
live in this world without sinning. He more or less admitted
guilt to all of these except the last one, and argued with his
peers on scriptural grounds. The presbytery suspended him. He
appealed to the Synod in Philadelphia, which was a higher court.
After a week or so of hearings his suspension was rescinded,
but he was rebuked for his aberrations. The presbytery resented
his reinstatement and it was apparent that they were out to get
him, first by giving him no appointments, and finally by suspending
him again, this time for not submitting to their authority. But
by this time he was already out on his own anyway.
The break with the Presbyterian Church was complete. As a final
act of protest he returned to them the $50.00 they gave him upon
his arrival in America. By the time the presbytery deposed him
from "the office of Holy Ministry" he had already written
the Declaration and Address and had organized the Christian
Association of Washington. The association was to help "unite
the Christians in all the sects," and it was not to be another
church. He hoped that many such societies would arise across
the land, dedicated to the task of reforming the church and restoring
its unity. The document was its Magna Charta and its slogan was
"Where the Scriptures speak, we speak: where the Scriptures
are silent, we are silent." Thomas had it with him in galley
proofs when he met his son Alexander and the family on a road
in western Pennsylvania, October 19, 1809, 20 days after their
arrival in New York, following 54 days on the high seas. Now
that they had had similar confrontations with sectarianism, which
left them both "free agents" of the Lord, and now had
their principles of reform worked out in that memorable document,
they were now ready to be further honed for the launching of a
unity movement.
And this is what was distinctive about the Declaration and
Address. It called for reform through unity. This is what
made the Campbell-Stone movement unique; it pled for a unity of
all believers as well as a restoration of the primitive faith.
The idea of restoration goes far back into efforts of reform,
whether to Glas and Sandeman, the Haldanes, or the Anabaptists.
But restoration and unity awaited the Restoration Movement
in this country.
Thomas' great document set forth unity principles. The
church, he insisted, is by its very nature one, and cannot help
but be one, if it be God's church. Nothing can be made the basis
of unity except what is expressly taught by Christ and his apostles.
Nothing can be made a term of communion that is not as old as
the New Testament. Inferences from scripture may be true doctrine,
but they cannot be made binding upon others further than they
perceive them to be so. Doctrinal systems may have value, but
they cannot be made essential to the faith since they are beyond
the understanding of many. Full knowledge of the Bible is not
necessary to fellowship, and no one should be required to make
a profession more extensive than his understanding. Division
by its very nature is sinful. Opinions cannot be made tests of
fellowship. The primitive faith as revealed in the New Testament
should determine the ordinances of the church, not the creeds
of men.
The Christian Association of Washington eventually became a congregation
in spite of its original intention. The Brush Run church, as
it was called, tried to work within a denominational framework.
It applied for membership in a Presbyterian presbytery that Thomas
thought would be friendly and was turned down. Once it became
"baptist" in that it was now immersed, it joined a Baptist
association, which did not work out. Then it joined another Baptist
association. That one it converted! That is, that Baptist association
gradually evolved into the Campbell wing of the Movement (the
Stone movement had begun down in Kentucky a few years earlier).
(Restoration Review, Vol. 18, No. 3; Mar. 1976)
 
|