Chapter 14
A MUDDLED MOVEMENT
W. Carl Ketcherside
It was my good fortune recently to conduct a study in Odessa,
Texas. This is a thriving city in the rich Permian Oil Basin.
A few years ago it was a small western ranch town, but in two
decades it has had a mushroom growth. It is just now becoming
somewhat adjusted after a period of "growing pains."
My purpose, however, is not to describe the region, but to point
up a condition among those who are heirs of the nineteenth century
restoration movement. Odessa presents a sad picture that is becoming
typical of many regions. It illustrates graphically what happens
when the party spirit invades the hearts of those who are the
religious descendants of a movement inaugurated to unite all believers
in our Lord Jesus, upon a common ground.
The disciple brotherhood is represented in Odessa by two groups,
one of the instrumental, and the other the noninstrumental
segment. Those who use the instrument in their public praise
service, are in turn divided into three congregations, neither
of which has any real fraternization with the others. The First
Christian Church is allied with "The Disciples of Christ."
It is accused by the others of being a Liberal group. The other
two, for want of better descriptive terms, and for purpose of
distinction, could probably be labeled as Conservative and conservative
Conservative, the degree being somewhat greater in the latter.
I deplore labels among brethren, but it is difficult to write
about such a situation without employing them.
There is no recognition of common ground or heritage upon the
part of the noninstrument groups toward the aforementioned.
One minister of the Christian Church told me he immersed a young
man who later married a "Church of Christ girl." Since
the bride could not conscientiously attend with the husband, his
preacher suggested to the latter to go with her. The husband
was informed that "The Church of Christ" did not recognize
"Christian Church baptism" so the man was forced to
come forward and confess in the presence of "The Church of
Christ" that he believed Jesus was the Christ, and God's
Son, whereupon he was immersed with "Church of Christ baptism."
Another Christian Church preacher informed me of a consecrated
young wife whom he immersed, but who later moved with her family
to a nearby town, where she began to attend "The Church of
Christ." The minister of this congregation visited her and
convinced her that since the Christian Church was a sect, they
could not baptize for the remission of sins, so she made the confession
once more and was immersed "according to the Bible."
A preacher for "The Church of Christ" volunteered to
me that he had a great burden upon his heart for the Conservative
Christian Church preachers, and felt the time might come when
many of them could be "converted." I asked him if he
regarded them as brethren, and he hastened to assure me he did
not, and would as soon call on a Methodist or Baptist preacher
to lead prayer, as to call upon one of them. I asked why, and
he said it was because of the practice of instrumental music.
Since brotherhood is the result of birth and common parentage,
I concluded that to be a brother to these men, one would need
to be "born of the water and of the Spirit and of opposition
to instrumental music." And, while I am opposed to the latter,
I have not been able to see how it negates brotherhood which is
not based upon it, but upon a common Fatherhood.
However, it is among the noninstrument churches that the
blighting influence of the party spirit is really rife. In Odessa
there are at least five different segments or factions, most of
which regard the others as apostates. Each looks upon
its own party as being the one holy, catholic, and apostolic church
of God on earth. There is a division into what is known as "Sunday
School" and "antiSunday School" churches.
These are again divided into "one cup" and "cups"
churches. One is opposed to Bible classes but use individual
containers to distribute the fruit of the vine to the communicants;
the other opposes both classes and cups. Neither regards the
other as in its "fellowship"; both brand and stigmatize
each other as "unfaithful" and "disloyal,"
each using its party prejudices as the criterion of faith and
loyalty to the Lord Jesus.
As is usually the case, the "Sunday School churches"
are the largest and most flourishing. They are in position to
show some contempt for the "antis" as they label those
who oppose classes. Each of the larger congregations has hired
a pastor to minister to the flock, and in one instance, at least,
there is an assistant minister, so that the "servant"
in the first degree, has in turn a servant of the second degree,
to assist him. Since these occupy a position identical with that
held by the Christian Church pastors, except that the ones in
"The Church of Christ" usually draw bigger salaries,
the differences on that subject have been dropped by adoption,
and the primary emphasis is on instrumental music.
A growing divergence is manifest among the noninstrument,
individual cup, Sunday School, antimissionary society churches,
however. To all intents and purposes, another split is imminent,
and in some places has already occurred with such vehemence as
to fracture them into splinters, and rock "the brotherhood."
The occasion of the latest schism is the Herald of Truth radio
and television program, and orphan homes existing as charitable
societies. These diverse factions use as their principal propaganda
organs the Gospel Advocate and Gospel Guardian,
with those who claim to advocate the gospel also advocating these
other things and those who claim to guard it, opposing
them. The outstanding defender of Herald of Truth at Abilene,
told me they did not "fellowship" the Guardian group
at all!
Adherents of the Guardian position denominate the others
as "Liberals" and are, in turn, denominated "Antis."
In conversation with two preachers of the latter faction, we
learned there were three groups in this period of transition.
These can be described as sound, shaky, and seditious. Both
factions acknowledge the existence of the three, but each reverses
the constituency. It is interesting to note that every party,
instrumental and noninstrumental, has its "Liberals"
and "Antis" depending upon the party test.
Among the instrumental groups, those who oppose the United Christian
Missionary Society are "antis." Among those who oppose
it, those who decry the use of instruments are "antis."
In the Gospel Advocate faction those who oppose the orphan homes
are "antis." Among these, those who oppose Bible classes
are "antis." These regard those who oppose individual
cups as "antis." This chain reaction continues down
to the final count, where no doubt the last person is "antiAnti."
The bigger fleas upon the dog,
Have smaller fleas that bite 'em;
And these, in turn, have lesser fleas,
And so on, ad infinitum!
Even the casual reader must recognize the fearful plight of those
who are "the New Testament Church." There is no prospect
of improvement. The future holds out for these factions more
strife, division and multiplication of selfrighteous partisanship.
This is the fruit of carnality and spiritual immaturity, of legalism
and unwritten creedalism, of pride and the party spirit. How
can they unite the world in Christ, while carving His body into
bits? It is time for those who can do so to rise above this wicked
spirit and demonstrate a love that transcends all human walls
and barriers, so its warmth may dispel the chilling frost of hate.
I taught in Odessa by invitation of a little group which, by choice
and conviction, does not have classes or individual cups. They
do possess a freedom which they extend to others in a manner which
proves them to be true restorationists at heart. They recognize
every consecrated immersed believer in the Sonship of Jesus of
Nazareth as a brother in Him. They are capable of distinguishing
between fellowship and endorsement, so they place brotherhood
above "party lines." Our studies together were unmarred
by any untoward incident. We labored together in mutual love!
My home was with J. T. Broseh and wife. He is a gospel preacher
of ability. I feel very close to him and the little group of
saints meeting at 30th and Golder Streets. I trust that all who
love the Lord will pray that the twentieth century sectarian movement
denominated "The Church of Christ" which grew out of
a glorious nineteenth century restoration attempt, will return
to its former purpose and intent.
(Mission Messenger: June 1960; Book: Covenants of God)
 
|