|
CHAPTER 20
NEITHER DESTROYED NOR NAILED TO THE CROSS
The Law of Moses was neither destroyed/abolished nor nailed to
the cross.
Jesus had been criticized early for his conduct on the Sabbath.
As he prefaced his discussion of some points of the law, he explained
his attitude toward the law in Matthew 5:17-19: "Think not
that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come
not to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you,
till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will
pass from the law until all is accomplished. Whoever relaxes one
of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be
called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and
teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven."
Jesus expressed a respect for the law that we have not always
appreciated.
The law delivered through Moses was not some sort of mistake or
undeveloped concept. It was unique in that it combined political
and religious laws. When a Jew paid his tithe, he was paying his
taxes and supporting religion at the same time. Some have described
this system as an inferior arrangement that would permit vengeance
by a person repaying in like kind. That is a gross misunderstanding.
The "eye for an eye" provision did not permit personal
retaliation or vengeance, but it spoke of the justice to be provided
by due process of law before the judges, guaranteeing that punishment
would not be too severe or too lenient. The punishment was to
fit the crime.
"It was just a carnal law," we hear. Is that right?
Paul wrote, "So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy
and just and good" (Rom. 7:12). In verse 14 he continues,
"We know that the law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold
under sin." The defect of carnality is in man. Man cannot
keep law perfectly. He sins. Law cannot remove guilt, neither
the Law of Moses nor any other law.
The loftiest concepts of Jesus' teachings were not new to him.
They were from the law. There he found the two greatest commandments.
"Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord, and you shall
love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your
soul, and with all your might" (Deut. 6:4-5). "You shall
not hate your brother in your heart, but you shall reason with
your neighbor, lest you bear sin because of him. You shall not
take vengeance or bear any grudge against the sons of your own
people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the
Lord" (Lev. 19:17f). There is nothing carnal or inferior
about those commandments. Of his Golden Rule, Jesus said, "for
this is the law and the prophets."
Did Jesus destroy the law? Let us consider three facets: (1) The
Old Testament Scriptures were not destroyed, (2) the moral law
did not cease, and (3) the ceremonial law was not abolished.
1. The Old Testament Scriptures Were Not Destroyed. The
early disciples were not called upon to scrap their Bible. They
searched the Scriptures and they preached from them. The Scriptures
spoke to them and they still speak to us. Timothy was urged to
"attend to the public reading of the Scripture." Even
in his last epistle, Paul exhorted Timothy, "But as for you,
continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing
from whom you learned it and how from childhood you have been
acquainted with the sacred writings which are able to instruct
you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All scripture
is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for
correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of
God may be complete, equipped for every good work" (2 Tim.
3:14-17). We misapply this text. Paul is not referring to New
Testament writings. None had been written in Timothy's childhood,
and no collection of sacred writings to the disciples had been
made when this letter was written. The Old Testament writings
are a great support to Christian faith.
2. The Moral Law Was Not Abolished. Jesus warned that whoever
would relax the least of the commandments would be called least
in the kingdom of heaven. These laws projected into the realm
of the kingdom.
The rabbis, scribes, and Pharisees expounded the traditional interpretations
which relaxed some laws and made others more stringent. When Jesus
would say, "You have heard that it was said... but I say...,"
he was not giving new Christian regulations so much as explaining
what the law meant originally. "Everyone who looks at a woman
lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart"
is but an explanation of the original intent of "You shall
not commit adultery."
Moral law existed before Moses and apart from Moses. All men have
been accountable to moral law. That's true now. A Gentile was
not a sinner because he did not keep Jewish rituals, but because
he had violated moral law. An alien today is not a sinner because
he does not keep Christian rituals, but because he has violated
moral law. He finds his forgiveness in Christ.
That the moral law, even as contained in the Law of Moses, is
still in effect is evident from many passages such as Romans 13:8-10.
Didn't Jesus nail the law to the cross? No. That would have destroyed
it. He didn't destroy it. But what of Colossians 2:13f? Let's
look at this favorite prooftext. Paul speaks of God "having
forgiven all our trespasses." By what means? "Having
canceled the bond which stood against us with its legal demands,
nailing it to the cross." The thing canceled was our sins-that
list of violations of laws-which bond was nailed to the cross.
The context reveals that Paul is addressing the uncircumcised
Gentile. He had not been under the Law of Moses and he had no
need for its removal. But his sins were nailed to the cross.
The New Easy to Read New Testament renders it simply, "We
owed a debt because we broke God's laws. That debt listed all
the rules we failed to follow. But God forgave us of that debt.
God took away that debt and nailed it to the cross."
With this interpretation, there is still a problem in harmonizing
Ephesians 2:14f in which Paul explains: "For he is our peace,
who has made us both one, and has broken down the dividing wall
of hostility, by abolishing in his flesh the law of commandments
and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in
the place of two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both
to God in one body through the cross, thereby bringing the hostility
to an end." The outer court of the temple in Jerusalem had
a barrier beyond which a Gentile was not permitted to go. Metaphorically,
this represented the law. When Jews and Gentiles were baptized
into Christ, that wall was destroyed metaphorically in the body
of Christ-"in his flesh."
"You have died to the law through the body of Christ,"
Paul assures, and he adds: "But now we are discharged from
the law, dead to that which held us captive, so that we serve
not under the old written code but in the new life of the Spirit"
(Rom. 7:4,6).
The law which distinguished between Jew and Gentile was made ineffective
because neither came to Jesus through it, but through faith. The
law was no longer a barrier to exclude the Gentile though it was
still kept by Jewish disciples. In this setting (Romans 7), Paul
expresses his respect for the law and reveals his continued struggle
with it.
3. The Ceremonial Law Was Not Destroyed. The Jewish disciples
continued to keep rituals of the law. They circumcised. At the
Jerusalem conference (Acts 15), it was agreed that circumcision
or the law could not be bound on the Gentiles. But the decision
expressed no intention of stopping the Jewish practice, assuring
that Moses was continually preached. Later, Paul took Timothy
and circumcised him (Acts 16:3). After many years of preaching,
on his way to Jerusalem before his arrest, Paul cut his hair,
for he had a vow (Acts 18:18).
When Paul arrived at Jerusalem (Acts 21:17-26), James and the
elders said to him, "You see, brother, how many thousands
there are among the Jews of those who have believed; they are
all zealous for the law..." They then requested that Paul
involve himself in ceremonies and offerings of purification to
convince all that he kept the law. He complied.
Without question, the law was being kept by disciples. These rituals
did not disqualify them from the grace of Christ. However, if
they performed them as an effort toward justification, they would
fall short of grace, because grace and forgiveness did not come
through the law. Grace must come through Christ. These religious
rituals were expressions of devotion but they were not efforts
of justification.
Jesus said that he would fulfill the law. That's what he did.
Being fulfilled, the ceremonies would become irrelevant and fade
from practice. All of the ritual offerings would find their fulfillment
in Christ -the Passover, scapegoat, atonement, firstfruits. peace
offering, sin offering, trespass offering. No longer would the
Temple visit bring the disciple into the Presence, for he is a
temple himself. The Temple priest is not needed, for the disciple
is a priest. The real thing will replace that which foreshadowed
it. The law was not destroyed, but it was fulfilled.
A man might be in service overseas. Each night his wife lovingly
studies his portrait and kisses it before going to sleep. But
when he returns home, she will not kiss his picture any longer
though she will keep and cherish it. While doing no violence to
his picture, the kissing of it will give way to his embrace and
kisses. Marriage does not abolish courtship, but fulfills it.
Adulthood does not destroy childhood, but fulfills its purpose.
So, Jesus did not destroy the law, but he accomplished its purpose.
God's final message to Israel is in the epistle to the Hebrews.
As it was being written, the old order was "growing old and
is ready to vanish away" (Heb. 8:13). With the destruction
of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., when the Jews were scattered, the Jewish
political-religious system was finally dissolved and it became
impractical to keep that system of law which had created and regulated
it. It had fulfilled its purpose.
 
|