|
CHAPTER 3
ARE WE REALLY BORN AGAIN?
In the new birth, does a person actually become a new being, or
is the concept of a new birth a literary device describing the
change affected in the life of a convert to Christ?
Nicodemus had some trouble in understanding what Jesus meant about
the requirement of a new birth, and he has plenty of company yet.
We accept Jesus' explanation that it is not a second birth from
one's physical mother but, in accepting the idea of a spiritual
regeneration, do we understand it as being the bringing into existence
of a new creature?
There is a natural birth and a spiritual birth. Jesus explained,
"That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which
is born of the Spirit is spirit" (John 3:6). In the birth
of the water and the Spirit, "We know that our old self was
crucified with him so that the sinful body might be destroyed"
(Rom. 6:6). We died with Christ, were buried with him by baptism
into death, and were raised with him that we might walk in newness
of life. "And you he made alive, when you were dead through
the trespasses and sins" (Eph. 2:1). Being baptized into
Christ, we can be assured that "if any one is in Christ,
he is a new creation (or creature); the old has passed away, behold,
the new has come" (2 Cor. S:17).
These and other references speak of being born again, being born
anew, being raised, being made alive, being regenerated, becoming
a new creature, receiving newness of life, and putting on the
new man. In this transaction one becomes a son, or child, of God
which, in analogy with natural birth, would indicate that a new
life comes into existence. These expressions seem to indicate
that a new spiritbeing is initiated into life replacing
an old, dead, discarded one.
All of this brings some questions. Is the spirit immortal? If
only the reborn being is immortal, then the unregenerate life
must cease to exist. If the unregenerate life is annihilated at
baptism, then it endures no punishment. If we accept the premise
that a new life is created in the new birth, we must conclude
that only the reborn person who becomes apostate is subject to
punishment. reborn person will suffer everlasting punishment.
Metaphors are only one of the many literary devices used in scripture.
A metaphor is a figure of speech where a word literally denoting
one idea is used in place of another to suggest likeness or analogy
between them, like Jesus saying he was a door' a vine, or a shepherd.
So, an abrupt, sanctifying change of life is referred to as a
new birth. The change initiated by faith which produces repentance
confirmed by baptism is like a person putting off one life and
putting on another. An old identity is repudiated and a new one
is established with Christ involving new desires, aims, goals,
and purposes.
The physical body is not changed in this conversion process. Each
organ still functions as before. The body is still responsive
to the same desires, instincts, and inclinations. Although there
is help in controlling the appetites, the alcoholic is still tempted
by alcohol, and the sexual interest of the lustful is not diminished
by some act of God in the new birth.
In the new birth personal traits are unchanged. The person has
the same knowledge, memory, experience, selfimage, abilities,
and emotions as before baptism. While it is true that the convert
will have a new determination and added help to use and control
these, these elements were not refined and changed by an act of
the Spirit in the person. We, not the Spirit, must "put to
death" our sinful nature (Col. 3:5). In the conversion process
the old, sinful person is not perfected by an act of God but,
through the grace of God applying the merit of Jesus, the person
is accounted as pure and innocent and as though righteousness
were actually accomplished in him. Because of the sinner's faith,
righteousness is imputed to him. He is justified by grace through
faith rather than being transformed into a different kind of person
by the Spirit.
Being baptized into Christ, the guilt of sin is remitted by Christ's
atonement. That guilt had brought separation and alienation from
God, which is spiritual death. Life forgiveness, reconciliation
is restored when the believing sinner is united with Christ in
baptism.
Even though we may all admit that the references to the new birth
are metaphorical, there may be some lingering doubt, or even serious
objection, in the mind of some. The metaphorical explanation credits
the change within us to our own reception of, and response to,
the gospel. It leaves out any change directly affected in the
individual by the power of the Holy Spirit. Upon our obedience
to the gospel, doesn't the Spirit enter into us to change us into
the kind of person Christ wants us to be? Isn't that a work accomplished
for us and in us?
At this point, our inherited sacramental concepts mix with thoughts
of achieved righteousness to cloud our vision. According to the
system of the sacraments, when certain prescribed rites or ceremonies
are performed, grace is infused into the soul and, by this means,
God makes us pure and righteous and the kind of person he wants
us to be. This calls for infused and achieved, or accomplished,
righteousness rather than the sinner being accounted as righteous
when he can never be anything but a sinner. The one concept is
that of baptismal regeneration Ð a change worked in the individual
through a sacrament to make him acceptable. The other concept
is that of justification on the basis of faith, in which imputed
justification is metaphorically termed as a regeneration or new
birth.
It is true that we receive the renewal in the Holy Spirit in our
washing of regeneration. This is done through the outpouring of
the Holy Spirit, which pouring out is the same as was fulfilled
by the baptism of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost, for the same word
used in quoting Joel in Acts 2:17 is used by Paul in the next
reference in speaking of his outpouring on us in our washing of
regeneration. This identifies the gift and the baptism of the
Spirit as being the same. This is stated comprehensively by Paul:
"He saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness,
but in virtue of his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration
and renewal in the Holy Spirit, which he poured out upon us richly
through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that we might be justified
by his grace and become heirs in the hope of eternal life"
(Titus 3:5f).
The Spirit cannot be poured out literally so that men may be filled
with the Holy Spirit literally, nor can one be baptized in the
Holy Spirit literally by immersion into and emersion out of him.
Neither can we believe that the Spirit literally inseminates water
so that it gives us birth. This must have its metaphorical aspects,
but it does not deny the activity of the Spirit. The Spirit does
not overpower the individual to do his work for "the
spirits of the prophets are subject to prophets" ( I Cor.
14:32).
I cannot understand or explain how the Spirit gives me life, lives
in me, and works in me, and I doubt that anyone else can either.
I am still not in position to speak condescendingly of Nicodemus'
lack of perception. Nicodemus could not understand the mysteries
of the wind but he could see the undeniable effects of it. I have
evidence of the working of the indwelt Spirit that surpasses the
usual subjective, individually perceived evidence when I see the
fruit of the Spirit in the life of the one who claims the promise.
 
|